Back to the directoryFind in the history view
Political psychology
Studies how psychological processes and political life shape each other, drawing on psychology, political science and other disciplines.
- Type of entry
- Interdisciplinary fieldAn area that draws on psychology together with other disciplines. Types are editorial labels, not an official classification.
- Cluster
- Social life and culturePeople in groups, cultures, communities and politics.
- Sources opened
- 3 of 32 read as a full page, 1 as selected text or an abstract, 0 not verified.
- Independent review
- Admitted after correctionsClaude Code reviewer agent, separate from the writer, 2026-10-21. 8 claims checked against 3 sources opened by the reviewer.
What it studies
Political psychology studies how psychological processes and political life shape each other. The International Society of Political Psychology describes itself as an interdisciplinary organization concerned with the relationships between political and psychological processes, with members from psychology, political science, history and journalism. A review essay describes the influence as running both ways, between people and political systems.
History and people
A review essay traces modern political psychology to the middle of the twentieth century, drawing on earlier thinkers such as Le Bon and Freud and on the Frankfurt School. It credits political scientist Harold Lasswell with applying psychoanalytic theory to political questions in books from 1930 to 1948. The Authoritarian Personality appeared in 1950. The International Society of Political Psychology was founded in 1978, and the society's About page says it was founded by Jeanne N. Knutson.
People and documented roles
- Harold Lasswell. American political scientist credited by Lavine's essay with applying psychoanalytic theory to political questions
- Jeanne N. Knutson. Named by the society as its founder
The essay credits Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson and Sanford with The Authoritarian Personality (1950), but gives only surnames, so they are not listed as people. Early contributors outside Europe and the United States are not documented in the sources opened.
Dated milestones
- 1930Publication. Year.Lasswell's Psychopathology and Politics, named in the essay as an early application of psychoanalytic theory to politics. [3]
- 1950Publication. Year.The Authoritarian Personality by Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson and Sanford, as dated in the essay. [3]
- 1978Society or organization formed. Year.International Society of Political Psychology founded; this records society formation, not the field's beginning. [1][2]
Methods
The authors of The Authoritarian Personality used surveys, projective tests and clinical interviews. The review essay says the psychological approach differs from traditional studies of political behavior by conceptualizing unobservable mental processes more formally, instead of inferring them only from overt behavior, and that it often contrasts with rational choice theory.
Training and applications
The society publishes the journal Political Psychology and an annual supplement, holds an annual conference and runs programs for early career scholars. The sources opened describe a scholarly community, not a licensed profession. In the United States, psychology titles and licenses are set by regulators, not by this guide, and none is described as specific to this area.
Boundaries and limits
The 1978 date belongs to the society, not to the field. The review essay says political psychology draws on many disciplines, including anthropology, economics, neuroscience, sociology and behavioral genetics, so its boundary with political science and psychology is porous. Lavine's essay says the field has moved beyond its traditional base in the United States, but the sources opened do not describe its institutional history outside the United States and Europe.
Evidence behind the claims
The International Society of Political Psychology describes itself as an interdisciplinary organization representing all fields of inquiry concerned with exploring the relationships between political and psychological processes, with members including psychologists, political scientists, historians and journalists.
The International Society of Political Psychology states that it was founded in 1978, and its About page says it was founded by Jeanne N. Knutson.
The society publishes the journal Political Psychology (housed at American University, published by Wiley) and an annual supplement, Advances in Political Psychology, runs an annual conference, and supports early career scholars through a committee, travel grants and the ISPP Academy.
Howard Lavine's essay says modern political psychology took shape in the middle of the twentieth century out of work by European thinkers such as Marx, Pareto, Le Bon and Freud and later the Frankfurt School.
The essay credits American political scientist Harold Lasswell with the most significant proximal development in the field's maturation, applying psychoanalytic theory to political questions in Psychopathology and Politics (1930), World Politics and Personal Insecurity (1935) and Power and Personality (1948).
The essay describes Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson and Sanford's 1950 The Authoritarian Personality as a study of the intrapsychic roots of anti-Semitism, ethnocentrism and fascism using surveys, projective tests and clinical interviews.
The essay says contemporary political psychology is defined by bidirectional influence between the psyche and the polity, draws on sources including cultural anthropology, history, economics, neuroscience, behavioral genetics, sociology and organizational behavior, and has moved well beyond its traditional base in the United States to be truly international in focus.
The essay says the psychological approach is distinguished from traditional studies of political behavior by the more formal conceptualization of unobservable mental events, and contrasts it with rational choice theory.
Where it appears
University examples
Examples show documented structures. They are not a ranking, a census, or a statement about admission or licensing.
In the Psy101 course
- OpenStax Psychology 2e, section 12.3: Attitudes and PersuasionChapter 12, Social Psychology. Topic reading. Nearest related reading; direct coverage of this field has not been verified.Attitudes and persuasion is the nearest textbook reading on political attitudes.
- OpenStax Psychology 2e, section 12.5: Prejudice and DiscriminationChapter 12, Social Psychology. Topic reading. Nearest related reading; direct coverage of this field has not been verified.Prejudice and discrimination is a nearby reading on intergroup politics.
This is course relevance only. It is not evidence for the historical or practice claims on this page.See the full course map.
Sources and inspection
3 of 3 sources were opened and read at the level shown. A source marked as not verified supports no claim on this page by itself.
- [1]ISPP At A GlanceInternational Society of Political Psychology, undated. Society history. Supports the history.Full page readRead the page text on founding year, journal, supplement, conference and committees; a linked 40-year history report was not opened.
- [2]About ISPPInternational Society of Political Psychology, undated. Professional association. Supports the definition of the area.Full page readRead the page text on scope, mission and history; it gives no formal definition of political psychology.
- [3]A Sketch of Political Psychology (editor's introduction)SAGE (anthology introduction by Howard Lavine; host sagepub.com), undated. Reference work. Supports the history.Selected text readRead introduction pages xix to xxiv as page images; the anthology title and year were not shown on those pages, and the text cites works through 2010.
Independent source review: Claude Code reviewer agent, separate from the writer, 2026-10-21. Verdict: Admitted after corrections. Of 8 claims checked, 8 were supported as written, 0 were reworded and 0 were removed.